The mafia could certainly make such referrals, so its very presence does not give peace.
Now imagine that all the townspeople who know something have said, we will / will not hang up such-and-such, because I have information that cannot be pronounced, and peaceful people who have no meaningful information said - well, we can’t say anything.
What to do the mafia, so as not to burn right away - but also say something like that.
And then - in itself, this did not give anything, but this statement will need to be consistent in the future.
While the peaceful will gladly use such statements of those whom they, by virtue of some facts, will find peaceful. And then one of these peaceful people will die in such a way that the role becomes plus or minus, and you will have to take this player’s statement for the truth as well or discredit him.
And how much easier it will become to assign roles if you divide the players into those who have something to say and who had nothing to say - after all, there will be such and peaceful ones too.
And how to win the mafia? The task is not too simple, in fact, because all the same can be reported more finely, but in a less obvious way, and more advanced players do just that. And so the option is cut off to say that the arguments for / against the player were unconvincing, not trying to somehow prove that they are not data on actions or something else secret.
The game is educational, just now there is an occasion to tell. GM was afraid to frighten off such not very compressible details, so we will find out in the process.
include only one nickname - shiori
And this is approximately what I wanted to show initially when I asked for the list. That your reason for not voting is inconclusive at the moment, given that you are not against all the other low-level assets, and only them.
Still not for voice in SamPai?
Then why. Given what I described above.
I can say why, regarding Julik, one can say no. Because he was also a victim, like Shiori now, have you forgotten about this? This is not an absolute argument against, but it needs to be neutralized to those who want to play against, do you agree? Open information, is in the subject, is available for discussion.